Korean Service
Purple Heart
     Infantry Weapons     
     THE WHOLE SITE     
     Combat Photos     

The Foundation of Freedom is the Courage of Ordinary People

History  Bert '53  On Line

"The future must not belong to those who slander the Prophet of Islam"

Barack Hussein Obama President of the United States of America, UN, 2012
Tea Party Americans would rather we support Freedom of Speech

DANISH CARTOONS, Satire, and The Prophet Muhammad

Danish Cartoon

Kortegaard -:

Islam has been ably and thoughtfully critiqued by many historical figures. But even simple cartoons satirizing the ridiculous can be dangerous.

The Danes, though not warlike, are not cowards.

On Liberty

Danish Cartoon

Kortegaard -:

A person "from the South-west Denmark", or South Jutland, is considered to be from the middle of nowhere.

Hardly a threat to the might of Islam.

Or does the threat come from the significance of the ideas, rather than the insignificance of the cartoonist? ??

Danish Cartoon

Kortegaard -:

The crescent and star as signifiers go back to Babylon. Although depicted in a few flags of Muslim countries they do not have any significance in the Islamic faith. In other words, the reason for depicting these symbols on flags is not Islamic or religious.

In this cartoon the star signifies a partial blindness. But of whom? It might be a comment on Muslims in general, but why must it be said to depict Muhammad ???

Danish Cartoon

Kortegaard -:

In an interview with the Israeli daily Ha'aretz, Sheikh Raid Salah, the leader of the Islamic Movement in Israel, and the most important political and religious leader of Israel's Arab population was asked, "Do 70 virgins await a shahid (a martyr) in Paradise?"

Sheikh Salah replied, "On this matter we have proof. It is written in the Koran and in the Sunna [the traditions about the life of Mohammed]. This matter is clear."

But why must the figure in Paradise represent Muhammad? Why not a satire of the Sheikh's interpretation?

Danish Cartoon

Kortegaard -:

In Daniel chapter 8 and several other symbolic prophecies, 'horns' represent 'spirit powers' at work in world affairs.

Horns can thus indicate Evil Angels who motivate, empower and direct earth's pagan conquerors to subdue and control the nations of the world. They can also represent Yahweh, the Almighty God.

Leaves the choice to the viewer, not bad for a cartoonist, but nothing suggests the figure to portray Muhammad.

Danish Cartoon

Kortegaard -:

Okay, this depicts an Arab of any century, leading an ass which could represent followers of equal intelligence.

It could be interpreted as representing the economic development of most Arabs.

It could be interpreted to represent any Muslim leader.

Nothing suggests it refers in any way to Muhammad.

Danish Cartoon


A 7th grade Arab-looking boy in front of a blackboard. Sticking out his tongue, he points to the Farsi chalkings. The boy is labelled 'Mohammed, Valby school, 7.A', implying that this Muhammed is a second-generation immigrant to Denmark rather than the man Muslims believe was a prophet. On his shirt is written 'Fremtiden' (the future).

Frem (forward) is also the name of a Valby football team whose uniforms resemble the boy's shirt. Valby is a district of Copenhagen known for having a concentrated population of immigrants.

Danish Cartoon


An abstract drawing of crescent moons and Stars of David, and a poem on oppression of women.

In English the poem could be read as: 'Prophet you crazy bloke! Keeping women under yoke'

Danish Cartoon

Kortegaard -:

Again the viewer has a choice of interpretation.

We might, by a great stretch, interpret the figure as representing the explosive ideas in the mind of the Prophet Muhammad.

We might more reasonably interpret it as representing the destructive interpretations of the Prophet in the distorted minds of radical Muslims.

Again, not bad for a cartoonist.

Danish Cartoon


An 'orange in the turban' is a Danish proverb meaning 'a stroke of luck.'

Well at least the cartoonist still has his head on his shoulders.

As of this writing.

Danish Cartoon


A police line-up of seven people, with the witness saying: 'Hm... I can't really recognise him'.

Not all people in the line-up are immediately identifiable. They are: (1) A generic Hippie, (2) politician Pia Kjaersgaard, (3) possibly Jesus, (4) possibly Buddha, (5) possibly Muhammad, (6) a generic Indian Guru, and (7) journalist carrying a sign saying: "public relations, call and get an offer".

Danish Cartoon

Kortegaard -:

My favorite of these cartoons.

To say it is directed at the Prophet Muhammad would concede the possibility of the cartoon's point.

This is almost certainly directed at radical Muslims who are blind to reality but willing to murder for the distorted vision that is in their irrational minds.

Cartoon Rage vs. Freedom of Speech
By Robert Spencer
New Front Page Magazine | February 2, 2006

These cartoons are much less offensive than what is routinely printed in every American newspaper about presidents, presidential candidates, and other pols. Yet strange as it may seem to Western non-Muslims, the rage over them seems to grow with each passing day — until the global scale of the response to it has now involved ambassadors from many countries, the United Nations, international boycotts, and the threatening of utterly innocent businesspeople and embassy personnel. A few recent examples:

Gaza: On Monday, gunmen seized an EU office, demanding apologies from Denmark and Norway (where another publication later reprinted the cartoons). On Tuesday, demonstrators chanted "War on Denmark, death to Denmark" as they burned Danish flags. Said Islamic Jihad leader Nafez Azzam: "We feel great rage at the continued attacks on Islam and the Prophet of Islam and we demand that the Danish government make a clear and public apology for the wrongful crime."

Arab interior ministers, meeting in Tunis, declared: "We ask the Danish authorities to take the necessary measures to punish those responsible for this harm and to take action to avoid a repeat.”

Libya and Saudi Arabia recalled their ambassadors from Copenhagen, while in Saudi Arabia, an angry mob beat two employees of the Danish corporation Arla Foods, which has been subjected to a crippling boycott throughout the Islamic world – a boycott that has been endorsed by, among others, the Sudanese Defense Minister

• Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshiyar Zebari complained to the Danish ambassador to Baghdad, while Danish troops were put on alert there after a fatwa concerning the cartoons was issued.

These incidents follow diplomatic protests from the Organization of the Islamic Conference, protests in Kashmir, death threats emanating from Pakistan, protests to the United Nations from the Muslim World League and other organizations, and more.

Even Bill Clinton has gotten into the act, decrying "these totally outrageous cartoons against Islam" and huffing self-righteously: "So now what are we going to do? ... Replace the anti-Semitic prejudice with anti-Islamic prejudice?” Of course not, but his question is beside the point. The cartoons are not a manifestation of anti-Islamic prejudice: criticism of Muhammad or even of Islam is not equivalent to anti-Semitism. Islam is not a race; the problems with it are not the product of fear mongering and fiction, but of ideology and facts -- facts that have been stressed repeatedly by Muslims around the world, when they commit violence in the name of Islam and justify that violence by its teachings. Noting, as some of the cartoons do, that there is a connection between the teachings of Muhammad and Islamic violence, is simply to manifest an awareness of what has been repeatedly asserted by Osama bin Laden, Ayman Al-Zawahiri, Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi, Omar Bakri, Abu Hamza, Abu Bakar Bashir, and so many others. Do all these men and so many, many others misunderstand and misrepresent the teachings of Muhammad and Islam? This question, as crucial as it is, is irrelevant to an ethical evaluation of the cartoons. The fact is, these and other jihad terrorists claim Muhammad’s example and words as their inspiration. Some of the cartoons call attention to that fact.

Ultimately, then, the cartoon controversy is a question of freedom of speech. As I wrote in mid-December: "As it grows into an international cause celebre, the cartoon controversy indicates the gulf between the Islamic world and the post-Christian West in matters of freedom of speech and expression. And it may yet turn out that as the West continues to pay homage to its idols of tolerance, multiculturalism, and pluralism, it will give up those hard-won freedoms voluntarily.” Freedom of speech encompasses precisely the freedom to annoy, to ridicule, to offend. If it doesn’t, it is hollow. The instant that any person or ideology is considered off-limits for critical examination and even ridicule, freedom of speech has been replaced by an ideological straitjacket. Westerners seem to grasp this easily when it comes to affronts to Christianity, even when they are as sharp-edged and offensive as Andres Serrano’s Piss Christ or Chris Ofili’s dung- and pornography-encrusted Holy Virgin Mary. But the same clarity of thought doesn’t seem to carry over to an Islamic context.

Yet that is where it is needed most today. The cartoon controversy, insignificant and even silly as it may be in its origins, is an increasingly serious challenge to Western notions of pluralism and freedom of speech. The Danes have already begun to apologize, to the tentative satisfaction of Danish Muslim groups. But so far both the newspaper Jyllands-Posten and the Prime Minister have limited themselves to saying essentially that they are sorry if Muslims took offense, and that none was intended. If they go farther and "punish those responsible,” as the Arab Interior Ministers demanded, or treat the cartoons as a human rights violation, as a Belgian imam demanded, they will be acknowledging that lampooning Muhammad and criticizing Islam is somehow wrong in itself. Such a notion is just as dangerous for a free society as the idea that the Beloved Leader or dialectical materialism is above criticism. It is death for a free society.

Not only that. Muslim cartoon rage, having spread now all across the Muslim world, from Egypt and Sudan toPakistan and beyond, also threatens to become the tinderbox that sets off a much larger conflagration between the West and the Islamic world than the present conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan . The Muslim world was enraged over the Abu Ghraib prison scandal, and over reports last May that a Qur’an had been flushed down at toilet at GuantanamoBay. But although there have been no killings in connection with the cartoons yet, as opposed to the Qur’an desecration scandal, the international scope of the cartoon rage makes those other sources of anger trivial comp Afghanistan in which people were reportedly killed — people who had nothing whatsoever to do with the alleged desecration — I wrote: "The question here is one of proportionate response. If a Qur’an had indeed been flushed, Muslims would have justifiably been offended. They may justifiably have considered the perpetrators boors, or barbarians, or hell-bound unbelievers. They may justifiably have issued denunciations accordingly. But that is all. To kill people thousands of miles away who had nothing to do with the act, and to fulminate with threats and murder against the entire Western world, all because of this alleged act, is not just disproportionate. It is not just excessive. It is mad. And every decent person in the world ought to have the courage to stand up and say that it is mad.”

No one has been killed for these cartoons. But otherwise the same words apply today to the cartoon controversy. It is mad. It should be denounced as mad. The fact that Bill Clinton is the only American politician who has taken notice of this ongoing controversy, and that on the wrong side, is a travesty.

The free world should be standing resolutely with Denmark , ready to defend freedom of speech. Insofar as it is not defended, it will surely be lost. On Wednesday publications all over Europe — in France , Spain , Germany , Italy , and Holland — published the cartoons to demonstrate their support for this principle. But in a grim reminder of the dhimmitude and multiculturalist fog that still grips us, the editor of France Soir was fired for doing so. The defense of free speech and free thought will not be easy, and is not the matter of just a day.

        KOREAN WAR TIME LINE         
     Tanks and Fighting Vehicles     
               Enemy Weapons              

     Korean War, 1950-1953        
  Map and Battles of the MLR   
                 SEARCH SITE                  

Poor Leadership Can Sometimes Cause Wars
Ordinary People Always Pay For Them

-  A   VETERAN's  Blog  -
Today's Issues and History's Lessons

  Danish Muslim Cartoons  

  Guest Book